MSST Bible

Higher bleedless (not so full)

Page 28 of 228 · Open the original GDoc ↗

(as above but more models and reversed order)

0) Gabox B/bleedless v3 (inst_gaboxBv3) | Huggingface / 2

Inst. fullness: 32.13, bleedless: 41.69, SDR 16.60

“can be muddy sometimes” but still fuller than the older one below.
Sometimes more buzzing than FV8b, although fuller, although it can change across the song when it will be exactly the opposite, and also buzzier than FV7z and FV7b


0) Unwa Mel-Roformer inst v2 (similar but fewer vocal residues (not always), muddier, bigger, heavier model)

Inst. fullness 31.85, bleedless 41.73 (less bleeding than Gabox instfv5/6)

Model files | MK Colab | Huggingface / 2 | uvronline via special link for: free/premium (scroll down) | MSST-GUI (or OG repo) | UVR Download Center)

Might miss the flute. “Sounds very similar to v1 but has less noise, pretty good” “the aforementioned noise from the V1 is less noticeable to none at all, depending on the track”.  “V2 is more muddy than V1 (on some songs), but less muddy than the Kim model. (...) [As for V1,] sometimes it's better at high frequencies” Aufr33
Might miss some samples or adlibs while cleaning inverts. SDR got a bit bigger (16.845 vs 16.595).

“Significantly less noise than v1e, sounds full enough, despite the fullness inst score, and that it recognizes more instruments than v1 and v1e, added to the fact it has higher SDR so also slightly less vocal crossbleeding in instrumental.” - dca100fb8

 

0) Unwa BS-Roformer-Inst-FNO | MK Colab

Inst. fullness: 32.03, bleedless: 42.87, SDR: 17.60
(again, because it fits metrically, more info moved near the top to recent bleedless section)

 

 

0) Gabox Inst_GaboxFv7z Mel Roformer (yaml) | MK Colab |  uvronline/x-minus.pro

Becruily vocal used for phase fixer on x-minus.pro/uvronline (premium).

Fullness: 29.96, bleedless: 44.61, SDR: 16.62

(again, because it fits metrically, -||-)

 

0) Gabox inst_fv7b Mel Roformer (yaml) | MK Colab

Inst. fullness 27.07, bleedless 47.49, SDR 16.71

(duplicate from the above)

Fullness worse than even most vocal Mel-Roformers (incl. BS-RoFormer SW and Mel Kim OG model).

“on the fuller side, somewhere around inst v1e+, maybe a tiny bit below. The main thing I notice is it captures more instruments than v1e+, but isn't muddy like [HyperACE] (which also captures more instruments)

can be a little on the noisy side sometimes... but it at least isn't muddy and sounds natural (...) I'd still ensemble if you want the noise reduced - rainboomdash (src)

In some lo-fi beats, it can keep muffling hi-hats by being too muddy.

 

 

0) Rifforge by mesk model final | MK Colab (below)

Can be more destructive for drums than the two above, more muddy, but it has even less buzzing by straight up picking noise existing in the mixture as vocals. It’s slow and big. Generally dedicated to metal, achieving better results there, but can work for hip-hop occasionally.

 

_________________________

 

Last resort  - muddier but cleaner single vocal models with more bleedless tested for instrumentals (sorted by bleedless) here | descriptions

_________________________